![]() ![]() In January, California became the first state to ban the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits in pet stores, unless they come from a shelter.Īnd last September, California became the first state to ban the sale of cosmetics that have been tested on animals. Last November, the state enacted perhaps the most comprehensive farmed animal protection legislation in the country. On its face, the wave of new animal protections might seem like a California thing. The bulk of fur products sold in California, Friedman says, come from overseas. Supporters hope that a fur ban in the state would strike a blow to the demand for fur, set a precedent for future states to follow suit, and, ultimately, lead to fewer animals being raised, trapped, and killed for their fur. Plus, they argue, real fur is more environmentally friendly than faux fur, which cannot break down.Ĭalifornia boasts the world’s fifth-largest economy, larger than that of the U.K. Opponents of the ban include fur industry groups in California and the International Fur Association, an industry trade group, which argue that a ban would harm commerce and censors the ability of consumers to make their own choices. “You really need to look at the values of your community and state.” bill and felt that the temperature was right to take the ban statewide. “Our two largest population centers had made this move,” says Friedman, who says she watched the tremendous amount of support around the L.A. Los Angeles and San Francisco both banned the sale of fur in the last year. ( Learn more about animal welfare concerns in the fur industry.) In May 2019, that number had risen to 45 percent, a new historical high. Gallup polling on the issue found that in May 2018, 37 percent of Americans said that they consider buying and wearing fur to be morally wrong. Unauthorized use is prohibited.īut Americans’ attitudes are shifting. And yet, fur seems to be making a comeback, at least among some customers. “Everyday advocates are making change happen within communities.” In turn, she says, it’s “creating more momentum for statewide legislation.” Banning the sale of furĮnding the use of fur, especially in high fashion, is one of the animal welfare movement’s longest running efforts. ![]() “There has been a trend where municipalities are taking on issues,” Kelly says. This series of state-level firsts reflects Americans’ growing concern for the wellbeing of animals, says Kim Kelly, director of legislative affairs at the Animal Legal Defense Fund, which spearheads legal fights for animal protection. It’s just the latest animal protection that’s been put in motion at the state and local level over the past year in the United States. It faces two more votes in the California senate, as well as the governor's approval, in order to pass. ![]() Yesterday, it unanimously passed its sixth hearing, during which dozens of California residents spoke up in support of the bill. “We’ve seen California voters more than once saying that any product involving animals should be humanely sourced,” says assembly member Laura Friedman, who introduced the statewide bill in her chamber, where it passed in May. In California yesterday, state senators considered a bill that would make it the first state in the country to ban the import and sale of fur products such as mink shawls, coyote fur-trimmed parkas, and pom-pom keychains made of rabbit fur. states have approved or are considering moves to ban the sale of fur, discourage cosmetics testing on animals, and end cat declawing, among other animal-friendly efforts. In a wave of groundbreaking animal welfare legislation, U.S. New York is the first state to outlaw the practice. Editor's Note: On July 22, 2019, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed legislation banning cat declawing in New York State. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |